Why do we use sel[x] here in u.q, could we not have just used x?

Community Support
,
1

https://learninghub.kx.com/forums/topic/why-do-we-use-selx-here-in-u-q-could-we-not-have-just-used-x

sel:{$[`~y;x;select from x where sym in y]} / from u.q

My understanding is that sel returns x unless you enter a y?

If this is the case, could we not have used “x” instead of “sel” in pub?

pub:{[t;x]{[t;x;w]if[count x:sel[x]w 1;(neg first w)(`upd;t;x)]}[t;x]each w t}
2

Hi,

The selw 1 , call is the same as sel[x;w 1]. So, y =w 1, which will be a list of symbols or if no filtering on syms is to be applied. Then within sel function, filtering is applied if y is not equal to with the select from x where sym in y.

Omitting sel from the pub function would remove this functionality to subscribe to a subset of syms.

Let me know if this helps or not.

Patrick