I don’t see this as the proper behavior of an adverb composition, but I suppose I can be persuaded otherwise ;)
q)a:(')[sum] /this application creates the expected derived function
q)a
sum’
q)b:(‘’)[sum] / ‘’ should be an adverb projection, since the operand to ’ is ’ (an adverb) and not a [derived] function but the second ’ is lost when ‘’ is applied?
q)b
sum’
q)a~b
1b