Received: by 10.101.62.10 with SMTP id p10mr2137948ank.14.1253160812763; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:13:32 -0700 (PDT)Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:13:32 -0700 (PDT)X-IP: 98.169.140.208User-Agent: G2/1.0X-Google-Token: 7i6oYAwAAACtQqQxI6eEmwCwmNhHIqqkX-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)Message-ID: <055abadb-9db6-413f-bb69-479b2facdc31@l35g2000vba.googlegroups.com>Subject: how Kdb+tick/taq look likeFrom: Dennis To: “Kdb+ Personal Developers” X-Google-Approved: charlie@kx.com via web at 2009-09-17 06:52:34Hi,I am new to kdb+ and currently reading some examples written in Q. Iread the readme doc and also some posts in this group. It have learnedthat the taq and tick are not downloaded free. However, when i gothrough the utility source code, i am able to see the taq and tickdirectory.The taq directory has a pretty large taq.q program and some othersmaller files. Is this a complete taq package?The tick directory, however, doesn’t have the tick.q but has someother files. How large the complete tick package is going to be? I amjust curious how much effort it requires to use Q to write somefunctions such as tick.I really appreciate your help.Dennis
To: personal-kdbplus@googlegroups.comX-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)the tick and taq directories I guess you’re referring tohttps://code.kx.com/trac/browser/kx/kdb%2B/tickandhttps://code.kx.com/trac/browser/kx/kdb%2B/taqare examples for use with tick/taq setupstaq.q in particular is a collection of sample queriesOn 17.09.2009, at 06:13, Dennis wrote:>> Hi,>> I am new to kdb+ and currently reading some examples written in Q. I> read the readme doc and also some posts in this group. It have learned> that the taq and tick are not downloaded free. However, when i go> through the utility source code, i am able to see the taq and tick> directory.>> The taq directory has a pretty large taq.q program and some other> smaller files. Is this a complete taq package?>> The tick directory, however, doesn’t have the tick.q but has some> other files. How large the complete tick package is going to be? I am> just curious how much effort it requires to use Q to write some> functions such as tick.>> I really appreciate your help.>> Dennis
Thanks Simon. So how large the actual tick/taq are? I guess it shallbe all q or k scripts without any c libs, right? I am just curious howpeople use Q/K to solve problem in real world.ThanksDennisOn Sep 17, 3:42?am, Simon Garland <simon.garl…> wrote:> the tick and taq directories I guess you’re referring to>> https://code.kx.com/trac/browser/kx/kdb%2B/tick> andhttps://code.kx.com/trac/browser/kx/kdb%2B/taq>> are examples for use with tick/taq setups> taq.q in particular is a collection of sample queries></simon.garl…>
To: personal-kdbplus@googlegroups.comX-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)taq is one k script, which is bulked up a bit by having to handle all the (taq) format changes over the yearstick is a few k of small q scripts that build on the functionality built into kdb+no C libraries neededessentially the design is a number of inter-communicating q processes with pub/sub interfaces /SimonOn 19.09.2009, at 19:19, Dennis wrote:>> Thanks Simon. So how large the actual tick/taq are? I guess it shall> be all q or k scripts without any c libs, right? I am just curious how> people use Q/K to solve problem in real world.>> Thanks> Dennis>> On Sep 17, 3:42 am, Simon Garland <simon.garl…> wrote:>> the tick and taq directories I guess you’re referring to>>>> https://code.kx.com/trac/browser/kx/kdb%2B/tick>> andhttps://code.kx.com/trac/browser/kx/kdb%2B/taq>>>> are examples for use with tick/taq setups>> taq.q in particular is a collection of sample queries</simon.garl…>